Model results
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
DeepSeek · Overall Models
- Score · relative 0–100
- 35.6
- Rank
- 33
- Status
- Complete 3/3
- Rank change
- Baseline
- Last tested
- 2026-09-10
- Settings tested
- All three benchmark settings tested
Scores by reasoning setting
| Tested setting | Score | Result status | Display group |
|---|---|---|---|
| Reasoning disabled | 31.1 | Tested and included | Baseline |
| High | 34.2 | Tested and included | Balanced |
| Max | 41.4 | Tested and included | Intensive |
Available settings and grouping
Available settings
Reasoning disabledLowHighMax
Checked on 2026-09-03 · Provider documentation
How settings are grouped
- Baseline: Reasoning disabled — tested and included
- Balanced: High — tested and included
- Intensive: Max — tested and included
Player program results
Max: 75% / 25% / 0% · n 8High: 88% / 12% / 0% · n 8Reasoning disabled: 63% / 12% / 25% · n 8 All three benchmark settings testedMany programs failedGeneration cost
- Average estimated cost
- $0.10
- Median estimated cost
- $0.10
- Estimated range
- $0.02–$0.28
- Cost data
- 24 combinations / 24 recorded runs
- Observed total
- $2.38
- Price source
- Provider-reported
- Price list
- Not recorded for this older data
- Average output
- 33k tokens
- Output range
- 2.3k–106k tokens
- Samples
- 24
Estimated cost gives equal weight to each model, game, and reasoning-setting combination.
Test setup
- Combines this model's tested reasoning settings
- Uses the standard GameBench player-program prompt