- Score · relative 0–100
- 43.0
- Rank
- —
- Status
- Provisional
- Players generated
- 2026-10-21
- Match evidence updated
- 2026-10-22
- Results published
Scores by reasoning setting
Available settings and grouping
Available settings
Checked on 2026-10-20 · Provider documentation
How settings are grouped
- Baseline: Reasoning disabled — tested and included
- Balanced: Reasoning enabled — tested and included
- Intensive: Not available for this model
Scores by game
What this result shows
Strongest included setting: Reasoning enabled (66.5).
Across included settings, the highest game score is Tumbleweed (59.8); the lowest is Chess (21.7). Each game counts every generation attempt, a failed one as 0. These are relative scores within each game, not direct comparisons of difficulty.
Match evidence measures these retained programs. It does not establish how a fresh generation will perform. Independent-generation variation is not estimated in this release.
Test protocol and evidence limits
- Model identifier
- elorian/glimpse
- Provider route (catalog)
- openrouter
- Prompt identity / profile
- Not retained in this result set / Not retained in this result set
- Prompt version
- Not retained in this result set
- Generation policy
- Generation-quality admission policy (see methodology)
- Requested output-token limits
- 235929 (23 of 23 indexed attempts)
Generation evidence
- Reasoning disabled: 5 contributing player programs across 5 games
- Reasoning enabled: 8 contributing player programs across 8 games
Counts describe contributing programs, not independent replications: repairs and resends are not new independent samples. Independent-generation lineage is not retained; the per-game counts below keep unique code identities separate from admitted generation runs.
| Game | Setting | Unique programs | Admitted generation runs | Program score range |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chess | medium | 1 | 1 | 43.5–43.5 |
| Game of the Amazons | medium | 1 | 1 | 77.1–77.1 |
| Game of the Amazons | none | 1 | 1 | 15.9–15.9 |
| Go | medium | 1 | 1 | 82.9–82.9 |
| Go | none | 1 | 1 | 14.0–14.0 |
| Hex | medium | 1 | 1 | 61.8–61.8 |
| International Draughts | medium | 1 | 1 | 86.2–86.2 |
| Shogi | medium | 1 | 1 | 36.2–36.2 |
| Shogi | none | 1 | 1 | 54.7–54.7 |
| Tumbleweed | medium | 1 | 1 | 89.3–89.3 |
| Tumbleweed | none | 1 | 1 | 30.3–30.3 |
| Xiangqi | medium | 1 | 1 | 54.9–54.9 |
| Xiangqi | none | 1 | 1 | 40.8–40.8 |
Program ranges describe the retained competitors on this release scale, not a statistical estimate of a fresh generation.
Failures and budgets
3 model-code generation failures; 0 provider/infrastructure failures excluded from the generation denominator. Runtime player faults are separate: 0 recorded one-sided faults across contributing program rows. A crash or illegal move pinned on one program also counts as that program's loss in its match record; other faults, such as timeouts, are left out of rating evidence.
Repair/resend outcomes and available costs are included. Exact retry ceilings and execution budgets are not retained in this result set; see the methodology for the public policy. Do not infer a measured setting from a current provider catalog.
Player program results
Reasoning enabled: 75% / 25% / 0% · n 8Reasoning disabled: 50% / 13% / 37% · n 8 No Overall rankIntensive not supportedMany programs failedGeneration cost
$0.08average estimated cost per game and reasoning setting
- Median
- $0.05
- Range
- $0.01–$0.22
- Provider-reported total
- $1.31
- Cost data
- 16 combinations · 16 runs
- Price source
- Provider-reported
- Price list
- boardgame-list-prices-2026-10-09
- Average output
- 25k tokens
- Output range
- 2.1k–73k tokens
- Runs with output-token data
- 16
How cost is measured
Comparison cost gives equal weight to each model, game, and reasoning-setting combination. Recorded generation attempts include repairs and resends when cost evidence is available; runtime compute and service operation are excluded. Cost and output-token counts use separate telemetry denominators. A list-price estimate is not actual expenditure; mixed evidence is not a uniform standard-price comparison.
Test protocol
- Combines this model's tested reasoning settings
- Player-program generation; retained protocol details are under “Test protocol and evidence limits” above