Model results
GPT 4.1
Provider: OpenAI
- Rank
- 20
- Status
- Partial 1/3
- Rank change
- Baseline
- Score
- 41.5
- Last tested
- 2026-08-05
- Settings tested
- Intensive not supported; Balanced not supported
Why this result is partial: one or more bracket scores are missing; three distinct provider settings are not documented; one or more documented settings are untested or ineligible; generation-quality evidence is missing. The rank uses the available reasoning-setting results.
Scores by reasoning setting
Available settings
None
Checked on 2026-07-21 · Provider documentation
Scores from tested settings
| Tested setting | Score | Result status | Display group |
|---|---|---|---|
| None | 41.5 | Tested and included | Baseline |
How settings are grouped
- Baseline: None — tested and included
- Balanced: Not available for this model
- Intensive: Not available for this model
Player program results
None: 63% / 37% / 0% · n 8 Intensive not supportedBalanced not supportedGeneration cost
- Average estimated cost
- $0.06
- Median estimated cost
- $0.04
- Estimated range
- $0.03–$0.09
- Cost data
- 8 combinations / 8 recorded runs
- Observed total
- $0.46
- Price source
- Standard list-price estimate
- Price list
- boardgame-list-prices-2026-08-08
- Average output
- 4.4k tokens
- Output range
- 2.3k–7.6k tokens
- Samples
- 8
Estimated cost gives equal weight to each model, game, and reasoning-setting combination.
Test setup
- Combines this model's tested reasoning settings
- Uses the standard GameBench player-program prompt