Model results
GPT 4.1 Nano
OpenAI · Overall Models
- Score · relative 0–100
- 40.1
- Rank
- 28
- Status
- Partial 1/3
- Rank change
- Baseline
- Players generated
- 2026-07-12 – 2026-07-12
- Match evidence updated
- 2026-09-26
- Results published
- 2026-09-26T08:55:16Z
- Settings tested
- Intensive not supported; Balanced not supported
Why this result is partial: one or more bracket scores are missing; three distinct provider settings are not documented; one or more documented settings are untested or ineligible; generation-quality evidence is missing; the official generation cohort is incomplete. The rank uses the available reasoning-setting results.
What this result shows
Strongest included setting: Reasoning field omitted (40.1).
Per-game evidence is unavailable.
Match evidence measures these retained programs. It does not establish how a fresh generation will perform. Independent-generation variation is not estimated in this release.
Test protocol and evidence limits
- Model identifier
- gpt-4.1-nano
- Provider route (catalog)
- openai
- Prompt identity / profile
- Not retained in this result set / Not retained in this result set
- Prompt version
- Not retained in this result set
- Generation policy
- Generation-quality admission policy (see methodology)
- Requested output-token limits
- Not retained (0 of 2 indexed attempts)
Generation evidence
- Reasoning field omitted: 1 contributing player programs across 1 games
Counts describe contributing programs, not independent replications: repairs and resends are not new independent samples. Independent-generation lineage is not retained; the per-game counts below keep unique code identities separate from admitted generation runs.
| Game | Setting | Unique programs | Admitted generation runs | Program score range |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Go | none | 1 | 1 | 40.1–40.1 |
Program ranges describe the retained competitors on this release scale, not a statistical estimate of a fresh generation.
Failures and budgets
0 model-code generation failures; 0 provider/infrastructure failures excluded from the generation denominator. Runtime player faults are separate: 0 recorded unilateral faults across contributing program rows, excluded from rating evidence.
Repair/resend outcomes and available costs are included. Exact retry ceilings and execution budgets are not retained in this result set; see the methodology for the public policy. Do not infer a measured setting from a current provider catalog.
Scores by reasoning setting
| Tested setting | Score | Result status | Display group |
|---|---|---|---|
| Reasoning field omitted | 40.1 | Tested and included | Baseline |
Available settings and grouping
Available settings
Checked on 2026-07-31 · Provider documentation
How settings are grouped
- Baseline: Reasoning field omitted — tested and included
- Balanced: Not available for this model
- Intensive: Not available for this model
Player program results
Reasoning field omitted: 100% / 0% / 0% · n 1 Intensive not supportedBalanced not supportedGeneration cost
- Average estimated cost
- $0.0023
- Median estimated cost
- $0.0023
- Estimated range
- $0.0023–$0.0023
- Cost data
- 1 combinations / 1 recorded runs
- Known cost subtotal (incomplete or unverified charges)
- $0.0023
- Price source
- Combined: Recorded attempt + Standard list-price estimate
- Price list
- boardgame-list-prices-2026-07-12 + boardgame-list-prices-2026-09-08
- Average output
- 2.0k tokens
- Output range
- 2.0k–2.0k tokens
- Runs with output-token evidence
- 1
Comparison cost gives equal weight to each model, game, and reasoning-setting combination. Recorded generation attempts include repairs and resends when cost evidence is available; runtime compute and service operation are excluded. Cost and output-token counts use separate telemetry denominators. A list-price estimate is not actual expenditure; mixed evidence is not a uniform standard-price comparison.
Test protocol
- Combines this model's tested reasoning settings
- Player-program generation; retained protocol evidence below