Model results
Muse Glimmer 30B
Other · Overall Models
- Score · relative 0–100
- 25.3
- Rank
- 57
- Status
- Complete 3/3
- Rank change
- Baseline
- Last tested
- 2026-09-10
- Settings tested
- All three benchmark settings tested
Scores by reasoning setting
| Tested setting | Score | Result status | Display group |
|---|---|---|---|
| Low | 24.3 | Tested and included | Baseline |
| Medium | 22.8 | Tested and included | Balanced |
| XHigh | 28.8 | Tested and included | Intensive |
Available settings and grouping
Available settings
LowMediumHighXHigh
Checked on 2026-09-03 · Provider documentation
How settings are grouped
- Baseline: Low — tested and included
- Balanced: Medium — tested and included
- Intensive: XHigh — tested and included
Player program results
XHigh: 63% / 25% / 12% · n 8Medium: 75% / 25% / 0% · n 8Low: 38% / 37% / 25% · n 8 All three benchmark settings testedMany programs failedGeneration cost
- Average estimated cost
- $0.01
- Median estimated cost
- $0.0085
- Estimated range
- $0.0040–$0.02
- Cost data
- 24 combinations / 24 recorded runs
- Observed total
- $0.28
- Price source
- Provider-reported
- Price list
- Not recorded for this older data
- Average output
- 6.4k tokens
- Output range
- 1.7k–17k tokens
- Samples
- 24
Estimated cost gives equal weight to each model, game, and reasoning-setting combination.
Test setup
- Combines this model's tested reasoning settings
- Uses the standard GameBench player-program prompt