- Score · relative 0–100
- 16.9
- Rank
- 75
- Status
- Partial 2/3
- Players generated
- 2026-07-02 – 2026-07-11
- Match evidence updated
- 2026-10-06
- Results published
Why this result is partial: one or more bracket scores are missing; three distinct provider settings are not documented; one or more documented settings are untested or ineligible; generation-quality evidence is missing; generation quality is below the publication threshold. The rank uses the available reasoning-setting results.
Scores by reasoning setting
Available settings and grouping
Available settings
Checked on 2026-07-21 · Provider documentation
How settings are grouped
- Baseline: Reasoning disabled — tested and included
- Balanced: Reasoning enabled — tested and included
- Intensive: Not available for this model
Scores by game
Per-game scores are not available for this result.
What this result shows
Strongest included setting: Reasoning disabled (18.1).
Per-game evidence is unavailable.
Match evidence measures these retained programs. It does not establish how a fresh generation will perform. Independent-generation variation is not estimated in this release.
Test protocol and evidence limits
- Model identifier
- nex-agi/nex-n2-pro
- Provider route (catalog)
- openrouter
- Prompt identity / profile
- Not retained in this result set / Not retained in this result set
- Prompt version
- Not retained in this result set
- Generation policy
- Generation-quality admission policy (see methodology)
- Requested output-token limits
- Not retained (0 of 53 indexed attempts)
Generation evidence
- Reasoning disabled: 7 contributing player programs across 7 games
- Reasoning enabled: 5 contributing player programs across 5 games
Counts describe contributing programs, not independent replications: repairs and resends are not new independent samples. Independent-generation lineage is not retained; the per-game counts below keep unique code identities separate from admitted generation runs.
| Game | Setting | Unique programs | Admitted generation runs | Program score range |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chess | none | 1 | 1 | 2.8–2.8 |
| Game of the Amazons | enabled | 1 | 1 | 30.7–30.7 |
| Game of the Amazons | none | 1 | 1 | 56.4–56.4 |
| Hex | enabled | 1 | 1 | 19.3–19.3 |
| Hex | none | 1 | 1 | 34.3–34.3 |
| International Draughts | enabled | 1 | 1 | 24.6–24.6 |
| International Draughts | none | 1 | 1 | 19.2–19.2 |
| Shogi | enabled | 1 | 1 | 14.1–14.1 |
| Shogi | none | 1 | 1 | 14.8–14.8 |
| Tumbleweed | enabled | 1 | 1 | 0.0–0.0 |
| Tumbleweed | none | 1 | 1 | 17.2–17.2 |
| Xiangqi | none | 1 | 1 | 10.9–10.9 |
Program ranges describe the retained competitors on this release scale, not a statistical estimate of a fresh generation.
Failures and budgets
12 model-code generation failures; 0 provider/infrastructure failures excluded from the generation denominator. Runtime player faults are separate: 0 recorded unilateral faults across contributing program rows, excluded from rating evidence.
Repair/resend outcomes and available costs are included. Exact retry ceilings and execution budgets are not retained in this result set; see the methodology for the public policy. Do not infer a measured setting from a current provider catalog.
Player program results
Reasoning enabled: 0% / 63% / 37% · n 8Reasoning disabled: 0% / 44% / 56% · n 16 Intensive not supportedMany programs needed repairMany programs failedGeneration cost
$0.13average estimated cost per game and reasoning setting
- Median
- $0.13
- Range
- $0.06–$0.22
- Known cost subtotal (incomplete or unverified charges)
- $3.41
- Cost data
- 16 combinations · 24 runs
- Price source
- Provider-reported
- Price list
- Not recorded for this older data
- Average output
- 110k tokens
- Output range
- 56k–143k tokens
- Runs with output-token data
- 24
How cost is measured
Comparison cost gives equal weight to each model, game, and reasoning-setting combination. Recorded generation attempts include repairs and resends when cost evidence is available; runtime compute and service operation are excluded. Cost and output-token counts use separate telemetry denominators. A list-price estimate is not actual expenditure; mixed evidence is not a uniform standard-price comparison.
Test protocol
- Combines this model's tested reasoning settings
- Player-program generation; retained protocol details are under “Test protocol and evidence limits” above