Model results
Qwen3.8 27B
Alibaba · Overall Models
- Score · relative 0–100
- 32.5
- Rank
- 42
- Status
- Partial 3/3
- Rank change
- Baseline
- Last tested
- 2026-09-10
- Settings tested
- All three benchmark settings tested
Why this result is partial: generation quality is below the publication threshold; fixed opponent-and-seat coverage is incomplete; the official generation cohort is incomplete. The rank uses the available reasoning-setting results.
Scores by reasoning setting
| Tested setting | Score | Result status | Display group |
|---|---|---|---|
| Reasoning disabled | 18.6 | Tested and included | Baseline |
| Medium | 31.8 | Tested and included | Balanced |
| XHigh | 47.1 | Tested and included | Intensive |
Available settings and grouping
Available settings
Reasoning disabledLowMediumXHigh
Checked on 2026-09-03 · Provider documentation
How settings are grouped
- Baseline: Reasoning disabled — tested and included
- Balanced: Medium — tested and included
- Intensive: XHigh — tested and included
Player program results
XHigh: 63% / 12% / 25% · n 8Medium: 29% / 43% / 28% · n 7Reasoning disabled: 13% / 25% / 62% · n 8 All three benchmark settings testedMany programs failedGeneration cost
- Average estimated cost
- $0.09
- Median estimated cost
- $0.04
- Estimated range
- $0.00–$0.35
- Cost data
- 24 combinations / 24 recorded runs
- Observed total
- $2.08
- Price source
- Provider-reported
- Price list
- Not recorded for this older data
- Average output
- 34k tokens
- Output range
- 3.9k–143k tokens
- Samples
- 23
Estimated cost gives equal weight to each model, game, and reasoning-setting combination.
Test setup
- Combines this model's tested reasoning settings
- Uses the standard GameBench player-program prompt