Model results
Hy3 Preview
Provider: Tencent
- Rank
- 30
- Status
- Partial 2/3
- Rank change
- Baseline
- Score
- 36.1
- Last tested
- 2026-08-05
- Settings tested
- Missing Balanced
Why this result is partial: one or more bracket scores are missing; one or more documented settings are untested or ineligible; generation-quality evidence is missing. The rank uses the available reasoning-setting results.
Scores by reasoning setting
Available settings
NoneLowHigh
Checked on 2026-07-21 · Provider documentation
Scores from tested settings
| Tested setting | Score | Result status | Display group |
|---|---|---|---|
| None | 37.2 | Tested and included | Baseline |
| High | 35.0 | Tested and included | Intensive |
How settings are grouped
- Baseline: None — tested and included
- Balanced: Low — available, not tested in the current results
- Intensive: High — tested and included
Player program results
High: 56% / 22% / 22% · n 9None: 50% / 25% / 25% · n 8 Missing BalancedMany programs failedGeneration cost
- Average estimated cost
- $0.0023
- Median estimated cost
- $0.0015
- Estimated range
- $0.000909–$0.0075
- Cost data
- 16 combinations / 17 recorded runs
- Observed total
- $0.04
- Price source
- Provider-reported
- Price list
- Not recorded for this older data
- Average output
- 7.7k tokens
- Output range
- 1.4k–28k tokens
- Samples
- 17
Estimated cost gives equal weight to each model, game, and reasoning-setting combination.
Test setup
- Combines this model's tested reasoning settings
- Uses the standard GameBench player-program prompt