- Score · relative 0–100
- 25.8
- Rank
- 55
- Status
- Partial 2/3
- Players generated
- 2026-07-02 – 2026-07-09
- Match evidence updated
- 2026-10-06
- Results published
Why this result is partial: one or more bracket scores are missing; one or more documented settings are untested or ineligible; generation-quality evidence is missing. The rank uses the available reasoning-setting results.
Scores by reasoning setting
Available settings and grouping
Available settings
Checked on 2026-07-21 · Provider documentation
How settings are grouped
- Baseline: None — tested and included
- Balanced: Medium — tested and included
- Intensive: XHigh — available, not tested in the current results
Scores by game
Per-game scores are not available for this result.
What this result shows
Strongest included setting: Medium (27.7).
Per-game evidence is unavailable.
Match evidence measures these retained programs. It does not establish how a fresh generation will perform. Independent-generation variation is not estimated in this release.
Test protocol and evidence limits
- Model identifier
- gpt-5.4-nano
- Provider route (catalog)
- openai
- Prompt identity / profile
- Not retained in this result set / Not retained in this result set
- Prompt version
- Not retained in this result set
- Generation policy
- Generation-quality admission policy (see methodology)
- Requested output-token limits
- Not retained (0 of 57 indexed attempts)
Generation evidence
- None: 12 contributing player programs across 7 games
- Medium: 12 contributing player programs across 7 games
Counts describe contributing programs, not independent replications: repairs and resends are not new independent samples. Independent-generation lineage is not retained; the per-game counts below keep unique code identities separate from admitted generation runs.
| Game | Setting | Unique programs | Admitted generation runs | Program score range |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chess | medium | 1 | 1 | 6.6–6.6 |
| Chess | none | 2 | 2 | 6.4–7.1 |
| Game of the Amazons | medium | 2 | 2 | 10.3–53.7 |
| Game of the Amazons | none | 1 | 1 | 24.3–24.3 |
| Go | medium | 2 | 2 | 0.0–25.8 |
| Go | none | 2 | 2 | 38.7–44.8 |
| Hex | medium | 2 | 2 | 23.8–68.2 |
| Hex | none | 2 | 2 | 13.6–14.2 |
| International Draughts | medium | 2 | 2 | 51.9–61.6 |
| International Draughts | none | 2 | 2 | 29.0–61.9 |
| Shogi | none | 1 | 1 | 15.8–15.8 |
| Tumbleweed | medium | 2 | 2 | 11.1–52.2 |
| Tumbleweed | none | 2 | 2 | 16.7–49.3 |
| Xiangqi | medium | 1 | 1 | 22.2–22.2 |
Program ranges describe the retained competitors on this release scale, not a statistical estimate of a fresh generation.
Failures and budgets
8 model-code generation failures; 0 provider/infrastructure failures excluded from the generation denominator. Runtime player faults are separate: 2 recorded unilateral faults across contributing program rows, excluded from rating evidence.
Repair/resend outcomes and available costs are included. Exact retry ceilings and execution budgets are not retained in this result set; see the methodology for the public policy. Do not infer a measured setting from a current provider catalog.
Player program results
Medium: 31% / 44% / 25% · n 16None: 31% / 44% / 25% · n 16 Missing IntensiveMany programs failedGeneration cost
$0.03average estimated cost per game and reasoning setting
- Median
- $0.02
- Range
- $0.0049–$0.27
- Known cost subtotal (incomplete or unverified charges)
- $1.08
- Cost data
- 17 combinations · 34 runs
- Price source
- Combined: Recorded attempt + Standard list-price estimate
- Price list
- boardgame-list-prices-2026-07-12 + boardgame-list-prices-2026-08-08 + boardgame-list-prices-2026-09-08
- Average output
- 22k tokens
- Output range
- 2.7k–256k tokens
- Runs with output-token data
- 34
How cost is measured
Comparison cost gives equal weight to each model, game, and reasoning-setting combination. Recorded generation attempts include repairs and resends when cost evidence is available; runtime compute and service operation are excluded. Cost and output-token counts use separate telemetry denominators. A list-price estimate is not actual expenditure; mixed evidence is not a uniform standard-price comparison.
Test protocol
- Combines this model's tested reasoning settings
- Player-program generation; retained protocol details are under “Test protocol and evidence limits” above