Model results
GPT-5.4 Nano
Provider: OpenAI
- Rank
- 26
- Status
- Partial 2/3
- Rank change
- Baseline
- Score
- 37.9
- Last tested
- 2026-08-05
- Settings tested
- Missing Intensive
Why this result is partial: one or more bracket scores are missing; one or more documented settings are untested or ineligible; generation-quality evidence is missing. The rank uses the available reasoning-setting results.
Scores by reasoning setting
Available settings
NoneLowMediumHighXHigh
Checked on 2026-07-21 · Provider documentation
Scores from tested settings
| Tested setting | Score | Result status | Display group |
|---|---|---|---|
| None | 36.1 | Tested and included | Baseline |
| Medium | 39.7 | Tested and included | Balanced |
How settings are grouped
- Baseline: None — tested and included
- Balanced: Medium — tested and included
- Intensive: XHigh — available, not tested in the current results
Player program results
Medium: 31% / 44% / 25% · n 16None: 31% / 44% / 25% · n 16 Missing IntensiveMany programs failedGeneration cost
- Average estimated cost
- $0.03
- Median estimated cost
- $0.02
- Estimated range
- $0.0049–$0.27
- Cost data
- 17 combinations / 34 recorded runs
- Observed total
- $1.08
- Price source
- Combined: Recorded attempt + Standard list-price estimate
- Price list
- boardgame-list-prices-2026-07-12 + boardgame-list-prices-2026-08-08
- Average output
- 22k tokens
- Output range
- 2.7k–256k tokens
- Samples
- 34
Estimated cost gives equal weight to each model, game, and reasoning-setting combination.
Test setup
- Combines this model's tested reasoning settings
- Uses the standard GameBench player-program prompt