Scores by reasoning setting

None (Baseline group, tested and included)18.8

Every tested setting is included in the overall score.

Available settings and grouping

Available settings

Reasoning disabledReasoning enabled

Checked on 2026-10-09 · Provider documentation

How settings are grouped

Baseline: Reasoning disabled — tested and included
Balanced: Reasoning enabled — available, not tested in the current results
Intensive: Not available for this model

Scores by game

Per-game scores are not available for this result.

What this result shows

Strongest included setting: Reasoning disabled (18.8).

Per-game evidence is unavailable.

Match evidence measures these retained programs. It does not establish how a fresh generation will perform. Independent-generation variation is not estimated in this release.

Test protocol and evidence limits

Model identifier: inclusionai/ling-3.1-flash
Provider route (catalog): openrouter
Prompt identity / profile: Not retained in this result set / Not retained in this result set
Prompt version: Not retained in this result set
Generation policy: Generation-quality admission policy (see methodology)
Requested output-token limits: 32768 (3 of 3 indexed attempts)

Generation evidence

Reasoning disabled: 1 contributing player programs across 1 games

Counts describe contributing programs, not independent replications: repairs and resends are not new independent samples. Independent-generation lineage is not retained; the per-game counts below keep unique code identities separate from admitted generation runs.

Game	Setting	Unique programs	Admitted generation runs	Program score range
Tumbleweed	none	1	1	18.8–18.8

Program ranges describe the retained competitors on this release scale, not a statistical estimate of a fresh generation.

Failures and budgets

0 model-code generation failures; 0 provider/infrastructure failures excluded from the generation denominator. Runtime player faults are separate: 0 recorded unilateral faults across contributing program rows, excluded from rating evidence.

Repair/resend outcomes and available costs are included. Exact retry ceilings and execution budgets are not retained in this result set; see the methodology for the public policy. Do not infer a measured setting from a current provider catalog.

Player program results

Reasoning disabled: 100% / 0% / 0% · n 1 No Overall rankIntensive not supportedMissing Balanced

Generation cost

$0.00average estimated cost per game and reasoning setting

Median: $0.00
Range: $0.00–$0.00
Provider-reported total: $0.00
Cost data: 2 combinations · 2 runs
Price source: Provider-reported
Price list: boardgame-list-prices-2026-10-09
Average output: 20k tokens
Output range: 6.2k–33k tokens
Runs with output-token data: 2

How cost is measured

Comparison cost gives equal weight to each model, game, and reasoning-setting combination. Recorded generation attempts include repairs and resends when cost evidence is available; runtime compute and service operation are excluded. Cost and output-token counts use separate telemetry denominators. A list-price estimate is not actual expenditure; mixed evidence is not a uniform standard-price comparison.

Test protocol

Combines this model's tested reasoning settings
Player-program generation; retained protocol details are under “Test protocol and evidence limits” above

Ling 3.1 Flash