Model results
O3
Provider: OpenAI
- Rank
- 28
- Status
- Partial 3/3
- Rank change
- Baseline
- Score
- 37.5
- Last tested
- 2026-08-23
- Settings tested
- All settings tested
Why this result is partial: generation quality is below the publication threshold. The rank uses the available reasoning-setting results.
Scores by reasoning setting
Available settings
LowMediumHigh
Checked on 2026-07-21 · Provider documentation
Scores from tested settings
| Tested setting | Score | Result status | Display group |
|---|---|---|---|
| Low | 22.8 | Tested and included | Baseline |
| Medium | 46.7 | Tested and included | Balanced |
| High | 42.8 | Tested and included | Intensive |
How settings are grouped
- Baseline: Low — tested and included
- Balanced: Medium — tested and included
- Intensive: High — tested and included
Player program results
High: 59% / 0% / 41% · n 32Medium: 75% / 0% / 25% · n 8Low: 50% / 0% / 50% · n 8 All settings testedMany programs failedGeneration cost
- Average estimated cost
- $0.08
- Median estimated cost
- $0.09
- Estimated range
- $0.04–$0.17
- Cost data
- 24 combinations / 48 recorded runs
- Observed total
- $4.20
- Price source
- Combined: Recorded attempt + Standard list-price estimate
- Price list
- boardgame-list-prices-2026-07-12 + boardgame-list-prices-2026-08-08
- Average output
- 8.2k tokens
- Output range
- 2.7k–16k tokens
- Samples
- 48
Estimated cost gives equal weight to each model, game, and reasoning-setting combination.
Test setup
- Combines this model's tested reasoning settings
- Uses the standard GameBench player-program prompt