Benchmark menu

Model results

Qwen3.7 Max

See how Qwen3.7 Max performed, which reasoning settings were tested, how often it produced a working player program, and what those runs cost.

Qwen3.7 Max

Provider: Alibaba

Rank
19
Status
Partial 2/3
Rank change
Baseline
Score
42.4
Last tested
2026-08-05
Settings tested
Intensive not supported

Why this result is partial: one or more bracket scores are missing; three distinct provider settings are not documented; one or more documented settings are untested or ineligible; generation-quality evidence is missing. The rank uses the available reasoning-setting results.

Scores by reasoning setting

Available settings

Reasoning disabledReasoning enabled

Checked on 2026-07-21 · Provider documentation

Scores from tested settings

Tested settingScoreResult statusDisplay group
Reasoning disabled42.1Tested and includedBaseline
Reasoning enabled42.7Tested and includedBalanced

How settings are grouped

  • Baseline: Reasoning disabled — tested and included
  • Balanced: Reasoning enabled — tested and included
  • Intensive: Not available for this model

Player program results

Reasoning enabled: 13% / 75% / 12% · n 8Reasoning disabled: 88% / 0% / 12% · n 8 Intensive not supportedMany programs needed repair

Generation cost

Average estimated cost
$0.06
Median estimated cost
$0.04
Estimated range
$0.02–$0.12
Cost data
16 combinations / 16 recorded runs
Observed total
$0.91
Price source
Provider-reported
Price list
Not recorded for this older data
Average output
11k tokens
Output range
1.6k–27k tokens
Samples
16

Estimated cost gives equal weight to each model, game, and reasoning-setting combination.

Test setup

  • Combines this model's tested reasoning settings
  • Uses the standard GameBench player-program prompt