Model results
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Provider: Google
- Rank
- 9
- Status
- Partial 2/3
- Rank change
- Baseline
- Score
- 51.3
- Last tested
- 2026-08-05
- Settings tested
- Missing Baseline
Why this result is partial: one or more bracket scores are missing; one or more documented settings are untested or ineligible; generation-quality evidence is missing. The rank uses the available reasoning-setting results.
Scores by reasoning setting
Available settings
MinimalLowMediumHigh
Checked on 2026-07-21 · Provider documentation
Scores from tested settings
| Tested setting | Score | Result status | Display group |
|---|---|---|---|
| Medium | 55.4 | Tested and included | Balanced |
| High | 47.3 | Tested and included | Intensive |
How settings are grouped
- Baseline: Minimal — available, not tested in the current results
- Balanced: Medium — tested and included
- Intensive: High — tested and included
Player program results
High: 0% / 75% / 25% · n 8Medium: 0% / 100% / 0% · n 8 Missing BaselineMany programs needed repairMany programs failedGeneration cost
- Average estimated cost
- $0.30
- Median estimated cost
- $0.34
- Estimated range
- $0.03–$0.69
- Cost data
- 24 combinations / 24 recorded runs
- Observed total
- $7.24
- Price source
- Provider-reported
- Price list
- Not recorded for this older data
- Average output
- 43k tokens
- Output range
- 26k–74k tokens
- Samples
- 16
Estimated cost gives equal weight to each model, game, and reasoning-setting combination.
Test setup
- Combines this model's tested reasoning settings
- Uses the standard GameBench player-program prompt