Model results
Grok 4.7
xAI · Overall Models
- Score · relative 0–100
- 55.2
- Rank
- 8
- Status
- Partial 3/3
- Rank change
- Baseline
- Players generated
- 2026-09-22 – 2026-09-23
- Match evidence updated
- 2026-09-26
- Results published
- 2026-09-26T08:55:16Z
- Settings tested
- All three benchmark settings tested
Why this result is partial: the official generation cohort is incomplete. The rank uses the available reasoning-setting results.
What this result shows
Strongest included setting: Medium (67.3).
Across included settings, the highest game score is Tumbleweed (63.8); the lowest is Go (48.9). These are relative scores within each game, not direct comparisons of difficulty.
Match evidence measures these retained programs. It does not establish how a fresh generation will perform. Independent-generation variation is not estimated in this release.
Test protocol and evidence limits
- Model identifier
- x-ai/grok-4.7
- Provider route (catalog)
- openrouter
- Prompt identity / profile
- Not retained in this result set / Not retained in this result set
- Prompt version
- Not retained in this result set
- Generation policy
- Generation-quality admission policy (see methodology)
- Requested output-token limits
- 450000 (22 of 22 indexed attempts)
Generation evidence
- Low: 7 contributing player programs across 7 games
- Medium: 6 contributing player programs across 6 games
- XHigh: 3 contributing player programs across 3 games
Counts describe contributing programs, not independent replications: repairs and resends are not new independent samples. Independent-generation lineage is not retained; the per-game counts below keep unique code identities separate from admitted generation runs.
| Game | Setting | Unique programs | Admitted generation runs | Program score range |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chess | low | 1 | 1 | 15.0–15.0 |
| Game of the Amazons | low | 1 | 1 | 46.3–46.3 |
| Game of the Amazons | medium | 1 | 1 | 63.7–63.7 |
| Game of the Amazons | xhigh | 1 | 1 | 60.2–60.2 |
| Go | low | 1 | 1 | 31.1–31.1 |
| Go | medium | 1 | 1 | 59.3–59.3 |
| Go | xhigh | 1 | 1 | 56.4–56.4 |
| Hex | low | 1 | 1 | 39.0–39.0 |
| Hex | medium | 1 | 1 | 79.8–79.8 |
| International Draughts | low | 1 | 1 | 75.1–75.1 |
| Shogi | medium | 1 | 1 | 58.3–58.3 |
| Tumbleweed | low | 1 | 1 | 54.5–54.5 |
| Tumbleweed | medium | 1 | 1 | 71.6–71.6 |
| Tumbleweed | xhigh | 1 | 1 | 65.2–65.2 |
| Xiangqi | low | 1 | 1 | 11.0–11.0 |
| Xiangqi | medium | 1 | 1 | 71.1–71.1 |
Program ranges describe the retained competitors on this release scale, not a statistical estimate of a fresh generation.
Failures and budgets
1 model-code generation failures; 3 provider/infrastructure failures excluded from the generation denominator. Runtime player faults are separate: 0 recorded unilateral faults across contributing program rows, excluded from rating evidence.
Repair/resend outcomes and available costs are included. Exact retry ceilings and execution budgets are not retained in this result set; see the methodology for the public policy. Do not infer a measured setting from a current provider catalog.
Scores by reasoning setting
| Tested setting | Score | Result status | Display group |
|---|---|---|---|
| Low | 37.6 | Tested and included | Baseline |
| Medium | 67.3 | Tested and included | Balanced |
| XHigh | 60.6 | Tested and included | Intensive |
Available settings and grouping
Available settings
Checked on 2026-09-22 · Provider documentation
How settings are grouped
- Baseline: Low — tested and included
- Balanced: Medium — tested and included
- Intensive: XHigh — tested and included
Player program results
XHigh: 100% / 0% / 0% · n 3Medium: 100% / 0% / 0% · n 6Low: 75% / 13% / 12% · n 8 All three benchmark settings testedGeneration cost
- Average estimated cost
- $0.21
- Median estimated cost
- $0.14
- Estimated range
- $0.00–$0.58
- Cost data
- 20 combinations / 20 recorded runs
- Provider-reported total
- $4.14
- Price source
- Provider-reported
- Price list
- boardgame-list-prices-2026-09-08
- Average output
- 42k tokens
- Output range
- 6.0k–117k tokens
- Runs with output-token evidence
- 20
Comparison cost gives equal weight to each model, game, and reasoning-setting combination. Recorded generation attempts include repairs and resends when cost evidence is available; runtime compute and service operation are excluded. Cost and output-token counts use separate telemetry denominators. A list-price estimate is not actual expenditure; mixed evidence is not a uniform standard-price comparison.
Test protocol
- Combines this model's tested reasoning settings
- Player-program generation; retained protocol evidence below